Ayuba Sanusi
THE Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has denied any attempts at cover-up of the identity of the owner of the humongous 753 duplexes and other apartments on Plot 109 Cadastral Zone C09, Lokogoma District, Abuja, stating that the company is flagged as the owner of the estate denied ownership.
The anti-graft agency, in a rebuttal to the barrage of criticisms regarding its handling of the information surrounding the final forfeiture of the properties, said its actions were in line with Section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud Act, which is a civil proceeding that allows for action-in-rem rather than action-in-personam. The former allows legal actions against a property and not an individual, especially in a situation of unclaimed property.
Justice Jude Onwuegbuzie of a Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court granted on Monday, 2 December 2024 granted, a final forfeiture request of the Commission.
EFCC’s statement is hereunder reproduced
Sowore and Co-Travellers’ Tantrums Against EFCC’s Landmark Recovery
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, is following with keen interest, the flurry of reactions to its record-breaking recovery of 753 duplexes and other apartments on Plot 109 Cadastral Zone C09, Lokogoma District, Abuja.
The commentaries of reform-minded Nigerians to the Commission’s painstaking efforts in securing the final forfeiture of the estate to the Federal Government of Nigeria are appreciated. However, the denigration of such efforts by Omowole Sowore and his think-same and act-same is unacceptable and grossly uncharitable.k
The allegation of a cover-up of the identity of the promoters of the estate stands logical on the head in the sense that the proceedings for the forfeiture of the estate were in line with Section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud Act, which is a civil proceeding that allows for action-in-rem rather than action-in-personam. The former allows legal actions against a property and not an individual, especially in a situation of unclaimed property. This Act allows you to take up a forfeiture proceeding against a chattel who is not a juristic person. This is exactly what the Commission did in respect of the estate.
The proceedings that yielded the final forfeiture of the estate were products of actionable intelligence available to the Commission. The company flagged by our investigations denied ownership of the estate following publications made in leading national newspapers. Based on this, the Commission approached the court for an order of final forfeiture which Justice Jude Onwuegbuzie of the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, High Court granted on Monday, 2 December 2024.
The expectation of the EFCC from citizen Sowore is a patriotic appreciation of its efforts in securing such a landmark forfeiture. Shockingly, the activist is not concerned about the systemic lassitude and unhelpful permissiveness that allowed such a monstrous corrupt act in the first instance. Nigerians should gear up more against lapses and loopholes in our system that continue to make the nation vulnerable to corrupt tendencies.
The EFCC will continue to safeguard the financial space of the nation against manipulators and organised brigandage.
It is important to note that the substantive criminal investigation on the matter continues. It would be unprofessional of the EFCC to go to town by mentioning names of individuals whose identities were not directly linked to any title document of the properties. The EFCC is unwavering in its no-sacred-cow approach to every matter, and together, we will make Nigeria greater.
Eighteen-Eleven Media