Kemisola Oye
THE Lagos State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal earlier today (Wednesday 24 May 2023) dismissed two petitions filed against the election of Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and his deputy, Obafemi Hamzat.
The Chairman of the three-man tribunal, Justice Arum Igyem Ashom, dismissed the petitions following their withdrawal by the parties.
Lawyers to the two parties, Henry Bello and Francis Ese, told the tribunal that their clients had decided to discontinue the petitions.
Other members of the tribunal are Justice Mikail Abdullahi and Justice Igho P. Braimoh.
Other respondents to the two petitions are Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and All Progressives Congress (APC).
Sanwo-Olu polled 762,134 votes to defeat Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour of the Labour Party (LP), his closest rival, who scored 312,329, while Olajide Adediran of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), who came third, garnered 62,449 votes.
The candidate of the Allied People’s Movement (APM), Funmilayo Kupoluyi scored 884 while the candidate of Alliance People’s Party (APP), Abiola Adeyemi scored 259, according to results announced by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
The parties had argued in their separate petitions that Sanwo-Olu and his deputy were not qualified to contest the election and that INEC failed to comply with the provisions of the Electoral Act and the provisions of the 1999 Constitution in the conduct of the election.
When the case was called, the lawyer to APM, Bello, informed the tribunal that the motion for withdrawal was predicated on four grounds supported by two affidavits sworn to by Yusuf Mamman Dantalle, the party’s National Chairman.
He said, “Our candidate has lost interest in the petition and has proceeded to congratulate the second respondent.
“We urge the petition to strike out this application.”
Counsel to APP also told the tribunal that he had the directive of the Chairman of the party, Chief Okey Nwosu, to withdraw the petition.
In his response, John Baiyeshe (SAN), who represented INEC in the APM petition, did not oppose the motion but asked the court to dismiss it, not strike it out, because parties have joined issues.
While counsel to Sanwo-Olu and Hamzat, Ayuba Kawu and that of the APC, Abiodun Owonikoko, did not oppose the motions for withdrawal. They also aligned themselves with Baiyeshe’s argument that the petition be dismissed.
“We have no objection to the application and no agreement or undertaking about withdrawing the petition. We align that the appropriate order to make is a dismissal”.
Owonikoko also submitted that it is trite law that where pleadings have been joined, the appropriate order is dismissal. “Once issues are joined and the time for filing a new petition has lapsed, the correct order is dismissal, not striking out.”
In his ruling, Justice Ashom held that “The sum effect of what the petitioners said is that the petition is withdrawn. The respondents have filed an affidavit of non-collision and did not object.
“Considering the level at which the petition is and that pleadings have been closed, we order that the petition be dismissed,” he held.
Eighteen-Eleven Media