Dele Olaosebikan
FOR the former Vice-Chancellor of Elizade University, Ilara-Mokin, Ondo State, Professor Adekunle Oloyede, the guilty verdict handed down to him by Mrs. Olufunke Adeola Adegoroye of an
Ondo State Chief Magistrate Court sitting in Akure was nothing but a gross miscarriage of justice.
Professor Oloyede has therefore approached the state High Court asking for a setting aside of the conviction.
Mrs. Adegoroye had on 25th January 2023, found the Australia-based professor of Medical Engineering guilty of all six-count charges of conspiracy to steal, obtain by false pretence, obtaining under false pretences of the sum of Seven Hundred and Twenty Dollars ($720,000.00) on 3rd March 2015 under the pretext of constructing 500-bed space hostel at Elizade University using panel building technology from Australia.
Professor Oloyede’s traducers had also accused him of obtaining another Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00) on 28 April 2017 from Mike Ade Investment Limited for Duro Global Property Limited for the same purpose of constructing a 500-bed hostel.
He was also alleged to have obtained another One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00) on 19 May 2015 from Omimeje Resources Limited for Duro Global Property Limited for the same purpose of constructing a 500-bed hostel.
He was also accused of another Six Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($650,000.00) from Elizade Investment Limited for the same purpose. According to the Ondo State Director of Public Prosecution represented by Mr. O.E Akintan, the alleged offence was contrary to and punishable under Section 419 of the state Criminal Code.
He pleaded not guilty.
However, at trial, Prof. Oloyede insisted he did not connive with anyone but merely acted as an intermediary and introduced the two parties, namely Duro Global Property Limited and Chief Michael Ade Ojo, founder and owner of Elizade University. He claimed no knowledge of when Chief Ade Ojo paid $720,000.00 or $250, 00.00 or $150, 000.00 to Duro Global Property Limited. He told the court that it was after Chief Ade Ojo had sent the money that he (Chief Michael Ade Ojo) informed him about it. He also said he was not at the meeting where the parties agreed to the contract between them. He said the reason $650,000.00 was sent to him (which was the only money that passed through him) was because of his role under the Power of Attorney.
He also told the court that Chief Ade Ojo paid $720,000.00, $250, 00.00 or $150,000 to Duro Global Property Limited. He said it was after Chief Ade Ojo had sent the money that he (Chief Michael Ade Ojo) informed him about it. He also said he was not at the meeting where the parties agreed to the contract between them.
However, Mrs. Adegoroye was not convinced of the evidence-in-chief of the ex-VC. She found him guilty and sentenced him to a cumulative eight years in prison with an option of a fine of Six Hundred Thousand Naira (N600,000.00) only.
Our correspondent reports that Professor Oloyede was not incarcerated as he opted for the fine option.
Meanwhile, dissatisfied with the decision of the court and determined to set aside the judgment, Professor Oloyede, through his counsel, Oke Olusola Esq. of Chief G. O. Ijalana Esq and Olusola Oke & Co of Graceville Law House, filed seven grounds of appeal.
Among others, Professor Oloyede insists Mrs. Adegoroye erred in law when she assumed jurisdiction to try the case notwithstanding that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case; that she reached a perverse decision when she relied on Exhibit p.28 to convict him; and that she further erred when she relied on substantive charge in count 3, 4, 5 and 6 which are on obtaining money under pretence to convict and sentence him on court 1, even though he was not charged with the offence of stealing.
Other grounds of appeal cited by Professor Oloyede are a miscarriage of justice occasioned by the finding of the court that the purpose of the money was for the payment of building materials which creates a big doubt in the case of the prosecution. Professor Oloyede, on a final note, insists that the entire decision of the magistrate court is unreasonable, unwarranted and can not be supported having regard to the weight of evidence.
No date has been fixed for the hearing of the application.
Meanwhile, our correspondent scooped that the suit leading to the earlier conviction was instigated by a thaw in the relationship between the erstwhile Vice-Chancellor and Chief Ade Ojo.